AI, explicit material
While we wait for ChatGPT, For comparison, here's a list that Deepseek R1 with Kagi gave me. It didn't ask me for any clarification.* The Wheel of Time by Robert Jordan: Uh, what? I...sort of...I guess I can see how it got there if I squint. But no!
* The Celestine Chronicles by Cebelius: fits my requirements. I read it, and I strongly disliked it.
* Monster Masseur by Virgil Knightley: I haven't read this one, but Virgil Knightley is an author I've read in the past, and he doesn't fade to black. Ever. At all.
* The Heartstone Saga by Archibald Bradford: never read it, might fit what I asked for.
* Aether’s Revival by Daniel Schinhofen: Yup, right down the line. I've read some of this author's other books, but not this one. Looks like exactly what I wanted, though.
So R1 sticks closer to requirements, accept when it goes wildly wrong. And yet I'd only read two of the books on this list. Is this a case of be careful what you ask for? R1's first try should be a winner, but ChatGPT's books were more of the sort of cozy hole some thing I actually wanted but didn't specify that I wanted that.