User avatar
Readeck @readeck@mastodon.online
1y
Hi all! I'm contemplating renaming the "Unread" category (it's not exactly unread items) to something that has a better meaning. Technically this category contains the items that are not in the archive. Here are some ideas, feel free to reply with other suggestions.

Edit: not renaming and keeping "unread" is an option but I can't change the poll.
Incoming 7 votes33%Pending 5 votes23%New 6 votes28%Ongoing 3 votes14%
21 users voted - Ended
5
0
0
0
User avatar
🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦 @fastfinge@interfree.ca
1y
@readeck I'm actually confused about this. So if you move something to the archive, it gets marked read? Can I have an unread item in the archive?
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Readeck @readeck@mastodon.online
1y
@fastfinge yes you can. I know it's not ideal but I couldn't find a better wording.
Read means "finished" and the archive is like a box into which you choose to put items
1
0
0
0
User avatar
🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦 @fastfinge@interfree.ca
1y
@readeck So will archived links still show in search? My use-case is to bookmark things that aren't really articles like software programs, etc, so I can find them later. But I'd like to archive them so they're out of my way when I'm looking for something to read.
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Readeck @readeck@mastodon.online
1y
@fastfinge the default search (the first text field) yields results from all categories.
Using the filters (one of the buttons after the URL field) gives you more options, including one labeled "Is Archived".

It makes me realize that the first search field could use the context you're in to apply some filters. For example, in "unread", you automatically look for "Is Archived: false"
1
0
0
0
User avatar
🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦 @fastfinge@interfree.ca
1y
@readeck So unread does not show archived items. So what's the point of marking an archived item read or unread? It feels like only one of these is needed. Either read/unread, or archived/unarchived. I think it's having both that leads to the confusion.
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Readeck @readeck@mastodon.online
1y
@fastfinge it's confusing, I feel you 😅
I think it's only a matter of renaming the "unread" section. I scratched my head a long time and finally decided to keep it for now.
(the automatic read status is something new, as of today actually)
3
0
0
0
User avatar
🇨🇦Samuel Proulx🇨🇦 @fastfinge@interfree.ca
1y
@readeck I would tend to rename "unread" to "unarchived". Then have a filter that deals with the actual read/unread status, and will show both archived and unarchived items. Either that, or get rid of archived entirely. Maybe introduce the concept of collections. Like the default collections could be unarchived and archived, but users could create there own. And read/unread would show everything across all collections.
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Readeck @readeck@mastodon.online
1y
@fastfinge I thought of getting rid of unread and favorites to only keep "all" and then provide 2 default collections pinned in the sidebar.
Only problem with that is that collections are dynamic and it's not easy to provide a counter for each entry without any impact on performances.
0
0
1
0