Note by @fastfinge

@CatHat @CStamp @RachelThornSub No, it isn't good at judging, because (hopefully) it's not the author or poster. The thing AI is most useful for is when the information that is relevant to me and the information that is relevant to the author are mismatched. For example, if I have a burning desire to know what color Penny Oleksiak's hair is, I can ask AI. It wasn't important to the article I was reading, so the author, correctly, did not include it. The AI says its auburn. This is now a thing I can no myself, whereas I would previously have to bother a sighted person about something trivial like this. And I'm aware that There's about a 15 percent chance the AI is telling lies, again. If it is, no harm done, really. Because the things I tend to ask AI about images I encounter aren't important enough to bother a sighted person about, and I would previously just be stuck not knowing at all. Now I can know with about an 85 percent certainty.